Andrew Jago

Associate director

Andrew is head of the costs team, with over 20 years’ experience in the field of costs law. He has vast knowledge in a wide range of legal costs issues, including international arbitration costs, multi-jurisdictional litigation, Solicitor Act assessments, and England and Wales-based costs claims.

He has established key specialisms in the fields of personal injury and medical negligence, commercial dispute resolution, and marine, trade and aviation. Having played an important part in developing the costs team at the firm, Andrew’s role is not only to build upon the continued success of the internal costs team, but also to provide bespoke cost services for all practices within the firm. He regularly provides costs advice and assistance in respect of international matters to the firm’s offices in Paris, Madrid, Singapore and Piraeus. The costs team has also recently become part of the Pro Bono Expert Support (PBES) Network. PBES is a scheme jointly delivered by the NPBC and Pro Bono Connect to offer litigation support services to pro bono cases, and the team is the only solicitors’ firm listed as specialist costs lawyers. Andrew regularly provides advice on pro bono cases.

I am an experienced costs lawyer and legal project manager with over 20 years’ experience, and am known for my commercial, pragmatic and client-focused advice. Whatever the case, I take pride in getting to know each situation and working closely with the main conducting lawyers to fully understand the issues involved.

Andrew Jago, Associate director

Qualifying as a costs lawyer in 2010, and as a legal project practitioner in 2018, Andrew is a ‘Best Practice Costs Champion’, delivering training to all fee earners on costs related issues to promote best practice across the firm. He has been recognised in the Chambers Litigation Support Guide, ranked in band 2. He is a confident advocate, having attended many detailed assessments and cost management hearings throughout the country. Andrew is also involved in the billing process for the firm, and is part of its risk committee, helping ensure the whole practice benefits from this additional internal expertise.

Recent work highlights

Default costs certificate defence

Obtaining a default costs certificate and resisting an application to get this set aside in the case of Willis v GWB Harthills & Others (2024).

Russian aviation claims case

Providing ongoing costs advice on a Russian aviation claims case, which was listed in The Lawyer’s top 20 cases of 2024.

Costs issues during Grenfell litigation

Providing strategic support in relation to the Grenfell litigation and navigating and resolving a range of costs issues.

Multi-party police litigation

Advising a client in an ongoing piece of complex litigation involving numerous police officers in respect of the costs budget and making an application to vary this budget under CPR 3.15A.

Costs budgets/variations

Providing costs advice in respect of costs budgets/variations under CPR 3.15A and costs claimed in the case of Hope Capital Ltd & Anor v Alexander Reece Thomson LLP (2023).

Application for permission for contempt of court

Being involved in the leading authority for application for permission for contempt of court in the case of Norman v Adler (2023). Andrew was instructed in respect of the costs claimed and a recovery of 92% was made.

Substantial crypto currency cases

Providing estimates and costs summaries based upon different funding models and various litigation scenarios for a number of high value crypto currency cases.

Salvage costs negotiation

Recovering costs on a common law salvage case involving the ship FLC Celebration. Costs had to be calculated and agreed with the ship owners and cargo interests

Substantial crypto currency cases

Providing estimates and costs summaries based upon different funding models and various litigation scenarios for a number of high value crypto currency cases.

Salvage costs negotiation

Recovering costs on a common law salvage case involving the ship FLC Celebration. Costs had to be calculated and agreed with the ship owners and cargo interests