Posted: 24/04/2023
This article was originally published on Onboard Online in April 2023.
While it is with some relief that the spate of fires over the last 18 months have only caused significant property damage and have not resulted in any serious injury or loss of life, fire damage and the resulting loss is usually devastating, leaving owners, crew and stakeholders in considerable shock, particularly if they have also had to fight the fires themselves.
Serious fires necessitate investigations from local authorities, police, fire brigade, Flag State and, of course, insurers all trying to get to the bottom of what happened. The interested parties will also seek to find ways to limit the loss and damage, often involving wreck removal, clearing up pollution and dealing with third party liabilities.
At least two Flag State reports have confirmed that lithium batteries used to power superyacht toys have caused fires resulting in total losses. However lithium batteries are apparently not always to blame. A number of fires appear to have been caused by electrical faults on board, and the precise cause - whether by a latent defect, product fault or negligent workmanship - may never in fact be determined if the yacht is burnt to a cinder within minutes. Fire investigators must attempt to piece together the picture by examining the physical evidence (fire patterns), along with crew accounts and maintenance records, which together may help to elucidate the cause.
Superyachts are naturally expected to be, well, super, incorporating a luxurious array of modern creature comforts and advanced technology on board. The reality, however, is that the space available for electrical equipment or the storage of superyacht toys is relatively confined, and the proliferation of technology places a high demand on the vessel’s power infrastructure. Furthermore, yachts and their equipment must endure exposure to salt water, humidity and varying extremes of temperature. The apparently elevated risk of fire justifies owners and stakeholders both taking preventative steps to better protect themselves and ensuring they have in place adequate insurance cover.
Interestingly, the SOLAS Convention and the IMDG Code (international code for the maritime transport of dangerous goods in packaged form) recognise lithium batteries having a capacity of over 100 watt hours as being subject to strict regulations for carriage. Any e-scooter or jet board battery would certainly be expected to exceed that capacity. The draft Marine Guidance Note 681 of the UK Maritime & Coastguard Agency addresses the handling of lithium batteries onboard yachts subject to the Red Ensign Group Large Yacht Code. This guidance proposes to bring in regulations which closely resemble the obligations for the 'Protection of Spaces Containing Vehicles or Craft with Fuel in their Tanks', relating to storage, charging, management systems, detection and training.
However, the recent spate of fires has mainly occurred on yachts between 20 and 35 metres, that may not always be classed or subject to the regulations applying to larger superyachts. These smaller yachts also have commensurately smaller crews and may not be manned at all times. For these vessels, it seems likely that the impetus for change will be commercial, driven by insurers covering the risks of such catastrophic fire events or marinas, who can ill afford to suffer fires like the one recently reported in Marbella, which destroyed some 80 yachts.
Whilst yachts are usually built and operated to the standards and codes required of them, only those that use new green technologies will be designed with systems for dealing with hazards such as lithium batteries. In any case, it is the owners’ choice as to what they bring on board the yacht, which is not necessarily known to the builder, unless, say, the specification clarifies that electrically powered water sports equipment will be used, which is frequently the case for larger yachts.
There are certainly takeaways that owners, managers and crews for any yacht could easily put into place to mitigate against the risk of fire. For instance:
Greater awareness of the risks amongst the crew who are handling tenders and toys with lithium batteries might go a long way to averting future fires. The Flag State report for KANGA confirmed that ‘the crew did not seem fully aware of the hazards associated with the lithium-ion batteries, which resulted in an inadequate assessment of the risks involved with these batteries, even after three of the four batteries were found leaking’.
In the unfortunate event of an incident, insurers really do need the full cooperation of the owner, manager and crew to carry out their investigation. Of course, at the outset, and subject to the levels of shock and trauma, obtaining contemporaneous evidence is crucial. What is less well understood is that one can be constrained by, or obliged to follow, the processes within the jurisdiction where the incident happened, resulting in considerable delays until key evidence is released, if at all. The ensuing legal proceedings may take years to unfold and so ongoing cooperation between insurers and assured really does need to continue long after the event.
The reliance on witness statements can be mitigated against if all operational and maintenance records are not lost in the fire. It is prudent for owners or yacht managers to have a centralised location ashore for backing up correspondence and documents. Crews should also avoid communicating with key contractors and yards via social media and messaging services unless these are also regularly backed up.
A related issue is whether marinas, keen to retain the custom of superyacht owners, will now invest in enhanced firefighting capabilities, so as to limit the spread of yacht fires which do occur.
It seems that the increased incidence of such fires is not attributable to one single root cause but, rather, is the culmination of several related issues. Owners must appreciate that insurers, yards and marinas will inevitably begin to enforce more stringent stipulations, concerning the equipment brought on board, how it is used and regarding safe manning requirements. Ultimately, a heightened risk awareness and concomitant reduction in the occurrence of fire is a better outcome for all concerned.