Vaginal mesh implants were commonly prescribed to treat conditions such as pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. However, due to safety concern, the use of mesh in this way was suspended in December 2017. Many patients reported significant health complications following surgery and are now pursuing vaginal mesh compensation claims.

Compensation for vaginal mesh problems

At Penningtons Manches Cooper, our specialist vaginal mesh solicitors are only too aware of the serious consequences vaginal mesh implants can have on patients. Recognised nationally for both our strong track record in this field and our client focused and sympathetic service, we are committed to helping those who have suffered as a result of vaginal mesh errors and to seeking the maximum compensation to which they are entitled.

‘Mesh’ refers to a number of different kinds of manufactured biological or synthetic implantable devices. These devices have been used for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse, a condition where one or more of the organs in the pelvis – either the uterus, bowel or bladder – drop down from their normal positions and bulge into the vagina. Pelvic tissues may become weak or damaged due to childbirth, menopause or following a hysterectomy. Vaginal mesh surgery or rectal mesh surgery has been performed to support the weak or damaged tissues in this area.

Polypropylene mid-urethral slings (such as transvaginal tapes and transobturator tapes) were also widely used for treating stress urinary incontinence, a very common bladder problem for women. This is the unintentional loss of urine when physical movement or activity such as coughing, sneezing, running or heavy lifting puts pressure on the bladder.

Whilst mesh has been an effective form of treatment for many patients, it has also led to devastating complications for others. Problems have included damage to the surrounding tissues and organs due to erosion of the mesh, chronic abdominal and pelvic pain, nerve damage, vaginal scarring, bleeding and discharge and an inability to have sexual relations.

They have genuine strength in depth and are really down to earth, committed, and true specialists in their field.

Chambers UK

Many of the patients who have asked us to help them pursue a vaginal mesh claim were unaware these problems could occur following surgery and were told the procedure had little risk of complication. They were not offered alternative methods of treating their symptoms or conservative treatment prior to being recommended surgery.

We have assisted women who have required major surgery to remove the mesh and who have been left with chronic pain. Some of our clients have needed ongoing treatment and our solicitors have been able to claim compensation to cover the cost of their care on a private basis.

Our experienced team works with a group of trusted medical experts who can also offer support throughout the vaginal mesh claims process. We offer a free of charge initial consultation without obligation. Funding options available to clients seeking compensation include no win no fee (conditional fee) agreements.

How we help our clients

Advice on the unnecessary use of vaginal mesh for stress incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse

Guidance on negligent rectal mesh surgery

Claims for mismanagement of mesh-related complications

Cases involving failure to identify complications caused by mesh

Cases involving inadequate guidance on treatment options

Claims linked to failure to obtain informed consent

Inappropriate mesh removal surgery claims

Useful resources

Recent work highlights

Unnecessary vaginal mesh surgery

Securing damages for a woman who endured vaginal bleeding for over two years as a result of an eroded mesh. Her surgery, which was recommended as a preventative measure, was subsequently judged to have been unnecessary.

Settlement after failure to obtain consent

Representing a woman who experienced complications following surgical procedures performed by a consultant gynaecologist. The patient was unaware that a transvaginal tape had been fitted.

Chain of surgical errors by gynaecologist

Advising a woman in her twenties who underwent numerous surgical operations and sustained both physical and psychological injuries following a series of errors in her treatment by a consultant gynaecologist.

Revision surgery after negligent procedure

Advising a woman whose vaginal tape had been incorrectly positioned during surgery for minor stress incontinence. She required revision surgery six years after the tape had been fitted.

Claim for unwarranted operation

Successfully settling a claim for our client who was wrongly advised that she needed an operation for mild stress incontinence when conservative treatment would have been successful.

Seven figure settlement

Achieving significant damages for a client who experienced a bladder overdistension injury caused by delayed catheterisation after a TVTO procedure. The injury led to permanent bladder dysfunction and severe depression.

Case studies

Keep exploring

Contact us

Please complete this form to send us your enquiry. We will be in touch shortly with a reply.

If you need to speak someone soon

We will only use the information you provide to handle your enquiry. Please read our privacy policy for more information.